Forty Wistar Albino female rats were utilized in the research. They were divided into five groups, each containing 8 rats: control, chemical cystitis (CS), CS+ALA, CS +TCE, and CS+HA. The experimental CS model was achieved by intraperitoneal instillation of cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg, 0.7 mL) for a total of 3 doses every 3 days. The control group received 0.9% NaCl instillation. Among the treatment groups, 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution containing 200 mg/kg ALA was instilled in the CS+ALA group, 0.3 mL Theranekron (tarantula cubensis extract, 1:100 / D2, Richter Pharma, Austria) was instilled in the CS +TCE group, and 2 ml of HA (%0,5) was instilled in the CS+HA group. These agents were administered to the treatment groups twice weekly for two weeks. To create similar stress in the KS and control groups, 0.9% NaCl was instilled for the same period. The rats were euthanized by cervical dislocation under general anesthesia three days after the end of the treatments. Cystectomy was performed via abdominal incision.
The bladder tissue was divided into two equal pieces. One-half of the bladder tissue was examined for histopathological changes such as mast cells, fibrosis, and degree of inflammation. Epithelial degeneration, fibrosis, submucosal edema, hyperemia, and inflammation were assessed using a scoring system from 0 to 3 (0 indicating no lesion, 1 for mild severity, 2 for moderate severity, and 3 for severe severity). Additionally, mast cells were counted across the entire section at a magnification of 20x. The other half was used for ELISA analysis to measure Interleukin 6 (IL6), Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1), Malondialdehyde (MDA), Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα), and Nerve Growth Factor βeta (NGF-β) levels. IL-6, SOD1, MDA, TNF-α, and NGF-β molecules were examined using supernatants, respectively. After the test applications, the measurements were evaluated on a microplate reader.
The statistical analyses of the study were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package of Social Science version 29 (Chicago, IL, USA). Data were presented as mean ± standard error. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was utilized to compare ELISA results among the study groups, while the LSD test was employed for multiple comparisons.