Can we predict urodynamic findings from examining prolapse with women with pelvic organ prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms?

Lemmon B1, Tadros M1, Fernando R1, Digesu A1, Bhide A1, Khullar V1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Abstract 622
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 105
Thursday 24th October 2024
14:15 - 14:20 (ePoster Station 4)
Exhibition Hall
Detrusor Overactivity Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stress Urinary Incontinence Urodynamics Techniques
1. St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Pelvic organ prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms often co-exist. However, the relationship between different compartments of prolapse and urinary symptoms is not well understood. Furthermore, there is even less published data exploring how each prolapse compartment effects the female bladder. Multiple studies have shown an association between grade of prolapse and overactive bladder (OAB) [1]. Anterior compartment prolapse in particular, has been previously shown to be related to severity of OAB symptoms [2]. Conversely there have been studies showing no relationship between urgency incontinence and prolapse grade [3].
The relationship between prolapse compartment, prolapse grade, and the urodynamic finding of detrusor overactivity is even less well investigated in the literature. In this study we aim to investigate how each prolapse compartment: anterior, mid or apical, and posterior, is associated with urodynamic findings of detrusor overactivity or urodynamic stress incontinence. 
Does clinical examination of prolapse predict urodynamic findings?
Study design, materials and methods
We examined the urodynamic traces, clinical symptoms, and clinical examinations of women with pelvic organ prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms referred to a tertiary level urogynaecology unit. Saline urodynamics were performed following ICS urodynamics recommendations, and all women had urodynamics performed with a vaginal pessary in situ. None of the women included in the study had undergone hysterectomy or previous pelvic floor surgery. 
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29. Chi-squared and linear regression models were used to explore the relationship between compartment of prolapse, stage of prolapse, and urodynamic findings.
Results
Urodynamic traces were reviewed from fifty-six women with pelvic organ prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms. The mean age of participants was 62 (range 40-87) and mean parity was 1.4 (range 0-3). 60% of the women had a grade 2 anterior compartment prolapse and 67% had a mild grade 1-2 mid-compartment prolapse. 60% of the women had a grade 2-3 posterior wall prolapse. 95% of this group reported at least one symptom of overactive bladder (urinary urgency, increased daytime frequency, nocturia, or urgency associated incontinence). 
The relationship between compartment of prolapse and urodynamic findings of detrusor overactivity or urodynamic stress incontinence were investigated using Chi-squared, where grade 0-1 was no significant prolapse and grade 2 or high was significant prolapse. We found no statistically significant correlations.

Linear regression modelling was used to assess whether prolapse compartments can predict the presence of detrusor overactivity.  This revealed that only posterior compartment related to the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (p=0.046). R2= 0.071 which demonstrates that the presence of grade of posterior wall prolapse only effects 7% of the result of detrusor overactivity seen during urodynamics. 
There were no statistically significant relationships between grade and compartment of prolapse and maximum detrusor pressure measured during detrusor contraction (pdetmax).
Interpretation of results
We found there was no statistically significant relationship between the presence of significant prolapse in particular compartments, and the presence of detrusor overactivity or urodynamic stress incontinence during normal saline urodynamics. We did find that grade of posterior compartment prolapse did have a statistically significant relationship with the presence of detrusor overactivity but with a small effect (R2=0.071)
 
There were no significant correlations between prolapse compartment and maximum detrusor pressures seen on urodynamics. Where the maximum detrusor pressure was used as a measure of severity of detrusor overactivity.
Concluding message
These findings suggest that there is not a strong relationship between clinical examination of prolapse and urodynamic findings. Clinical examination of prolapse therefore does not allow for an accurate prediction of bladder function. This gives some additional evidence to the importance of performing urodynamics as part of a full assessment of women with prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms prior to pelvic floor repair.
Figure 1
Figure 2 Table showing the alpha values from Chi squared test of prolapse compartment and the presence of detrusor overactivity or urodynamic stress incontinence
References
  1. De Boer, Salvatore, Cardozo, Chapple, Kelleher, van Kerrebroeck, Kirby, Koelbl, Espuna-Pons, Milsom, Tubaro, Wagg, Vierhout. Pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:30–9.
  2. Zheng Yong Yuan, Hong Shen. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification in women referred with overactive bladder. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:1365–9.
  3. Schimpf, O'Sullivan, LaSala, Tulikangas. Anterior vaginal wall prolapse and voiding dysfunction in urogynecology patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:721–5
Disclosures
Funding No funding Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust Research and Ethics Committee Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
23/12/2024 08:48:50