Pelvic floor disorders among transgender patients: a scoping review

OLIVEIRA BRITO L1, PEREIRA G1, HATANAKA L1, MILAN C1, AMARAL R1, JORGE C2, HASSUN L1, LARA L2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Transgender Health

Best in Category Prize: Transgender Health
Abstract 526
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 104
Thursday 24th October 2024
11:20 - 11:25 (ePoster Station 2)
Exhibit Hall
Transgender Pelvic Floor Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Gender Affirming Surgery
1. University of Campinas, 2. University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Medical School
Presenter
L

LUIZ GUSTAVO OLIVEIRA BRITO

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Gender incongruence presents a 1% prevalence worldwide and is the discrepancy between anatomical sex assigned at birth and the gender experienced by the individual. Transmen and women are at high risk for physical and sexual violence and often faces several barriers for health access. Currently, there are few studies characterizing the pelvic floor of male or female transgender individuals, and they are mostly focused in sexual function, with one review published about it for transwomen [1] and a recent systematic on the prevalence of endometriosis in transmen [2]. However, it is unknown which risk factors are associated with pelvic floor disorders in these populations or whether gender affirming procedures may impact in the pelvic floor. There is lack of information regarding urinary, anorectal, and prolapse symptoms .The need for a summary of these studies is imperative to assess what are the research needs for this population with regard to the most frequent pelvic floor disorders (urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and fecal incontinence). Considering that it would be less likely to find robust information, we aimed to perform a scoping review with the available evidence on this subject.
Study design, materials and methods
A scoping review was performed using a broad search strategy ((transgender OR transfeminine OR transmasculine OR transmen OR transwomen) AND ("pelvic floor" OR "urinary incontinence" OR "pelvic organ prolapse" OR "fecal incontinence")) comprising most pelvic floor disorders in March 2024 at PubMed database by two independent reviews. We excluded as primary outcomes studies that focused on pelvic pain and sexual function.  No language barriers were present, and studies were selected by title and/or summary with the aid of Rayyan software. We did not plan to undergo metanalysis as this would be probably not possible to execute. Publication bias was not assessed due to the low number of publications. Data was presented in descriptive format. Our primary outcomes were urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse or fecal/anal incontinence, diagnosed by subjective, dichotomous questions or by a validated questionnaire . Quality of the study was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies.
Results
Of the 50 results retrieved in the search strategy, no duplicates were found and four studies were selected for full-text analysis (Table 1). No studies assessing the pelvic floor in transgender men were found. The number of transgender females varied from 15 to 77 patients. All studies varied with regard to primary outcomes. Urinary incontinence (UI) as a dichotomous question (yes/no) varied from 15.4% to 40% prevalence prior to gender affirming surgeries (GAS). PF dysfunction, with no distinction,  was present in 42% of TG women and bowel dysfunction in 37% of patients in the largest study to this moment (n=77). Another study analyzed PFM strength and concluded it declined 15 days after GAS. The unique randomized study measured PF scores for UI and intestinal symptoms but did not compare with a control. With regard to the methodological quality, all studies presented low Newcastle-Ottawa scores. No studies presented sample size calculation, except for the RCT, which was based on the experience of the physiotherapists from their group.
Interpretation of results
The aim of performing a scoping review for this question was appropriate as we postulated that scant data would be available for transgender population with regard to pelvic floor symptoms. Sexual function, quality of life and pelvic pain were variables already investigated but the pelvic floor remains a mistery. Existing data is heterogeneous and needs caution when considering external validity as all studies did not present sample size calculation and less than 100 patients per study. More robust studies using validated questionnaires, with higher sample sizes are necessary so that confounding factors can be isolated and subgroup analysis according to presence of GAS or hormone therapy could be performed.
Concluding message
There is scant literature with regard to pelvic floor symptoms in transgender population. No information is available for transmen and there is heterogeneity with regard to the primary outcomes in studies for transgender women. Urinary incontinence rates are varied about transgender women and pelvic floor muscle strength seems to decline after gender affirming surgeries.
Figure 1 Table 1. Selected studies containing information regarding pelvic floor assessment for transgender patients
References
  1. Barcelos TMR, Ferreira CHJ, Lerri MR, Brito LGO, de Sá MFS, de Sá ACS, da Silva Lara LA. Sexual function of transgender women after gender affirming surgery: A mini review. Clin Anat. 2022 Jul;35(5):560-570. doi: 10.1002/ca.23863. Epub 2022 Apr 2. PMID: 35334140.
  2. Okita F, Abrao M, Lara LAS, Andres MP, Cunha C, Oliviera Brito L. Endometriosis in Transgender Men - a Systematic Review with Metanalysis. J Minim Invas Gynecol 2021;28(11):S103-S104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.09.140
Disclosures
Funding No funding Clinical Trial No Subjects None
27/07/2024 20:27:37