Are muscle mechanical properties affected at lumbar and pelvic floor levels in women with stress urinary incontinence?

Cruz Medel I1, Garzón Alfaro M1, Sartorato Beleza A2, Paleari Zanoni M2, de Araujo Silva C2, Alburquerque-Sendín F1, Rodrigues-de-Souza D1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Anatomy / Biomechanics

Gold Pass video coming soon
Find out more

Abstract 284
Biomechanics
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 27
Friday 25th October 2024
14:22 - 14:30
N102
Biomechanics Pelvic Floor Stress Urinary Incontinence
1. University of Córdoba - Spain, 2. Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar) – São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Presenter
I

Inés Cruz Medel

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Myotonometry has recently been used to evaluate pelvic floor muscle properties [1]. Muscle mechanical properties (MMPs) have been used as a marker to determine the clinical effects of exercises in some situations in women health [2], but there is little information regarding the MMPs in stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The most common type of incontinence in women, exceeding 60% of the total cases, is SUI [2]. There are no data on the status of lumbopelvic tone or its relationship with other variables in SUI. Thus, this study aimed to determine whether lumbopelvic MMPs are different in women with SUI compared to healthy ones.
Study design, materials and methods
This is a cross-sectional study, which included women aged 18-60 years, SUI diagnosed (cases) and matched healthy controls. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. The MMPs, that is, Tone (Hz); biomechanical properties (Stiffness (N/m) and logarithmic Decrement, which is the inverse of the elasticity) and viscoelastic properties (Relaxation (ms) and Creep (Deborah Number -De-), which characterizes fluidity), were evaluated on both sides of the central perineal body for the perineal muscles, and on the erector spinae at 2.5 cm to the right and left of the L5 vertebra for lumbar muscles. Unpaired Student t-tests were applied to identify between groups differences in MMPs.
Results
A total sample of 44 women with SUI (34.67 ± 13.47 years old) and 50 healthy women (35.24 ± 14.72 years old) was analyzed. All MMPs of the pelvic floor (PF), except the Stiffness, differed between groups. Thus, Tone (mean difference (MD)=1.26, 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=0.59,1.94) and Decrement (MD=0.07, 95%CI=0.01,0.14) were higher in the healthy individuals, but Relaxation (MD=-1.14, 95%CI=-2.01,-0.28) and Creep (MD=-0.05, 95%CI=-0.09,-0.02) were higher in SUI individuals. Regarding Lumbar muscles, only the Decrement was different between groups (MD=-0.20, 95%CI=-0.35,-0.05), with healthy women showing more elasticity than women with SUI.
Interpretation of results
Lumbopelvic MMPs are affected in women with SUI. Women with SUI had less tone, which could predispose to a delayed and worse muscle contraction, while continent women produce higher activity of pelvic floor muscles (PFM). Lumbar MMPs of women with SUI had less elasticity. In this sense, the relationships between IU, pain and stiffness in the pelvic area, and posture justify the necessity of a broad assessment in SUI, even for treatment purposes [3].
Concluding message
Pelvic floor tone increased, while elasticity and viscoelastic properties and lumbar elasticity are decreased in SUI. The evaluation of lumbopelvic MMPs can be applied in clinical settings due to their innocuousness and applicability.
Figure 1 Table 1. MMPs of the PF and lumbar muscles (mean of both sides) in women with and without SUI. / Values expressed as means ± SD. a Significant difference (P<0.05) between groups. Abbreviations: SUI: stress urinary incontinence; PF: pelvic floor.
References
  1. Frawley H, Shelly B, Morin M, Bernard S, Bø K, Digesu GA, Dickinson T, Goonewardene S, McClurg D, Rahnama'i MS, Schizas A, Slieker-Ten Hove M, Takahashi S, Voelkl Guevara J. An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for pelvic floor muscle assessment. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Jun;40(5):1217-1260. doi: 10.1002/nau.24658.
  2. Ng SF, Lok MK, Pang SM, et al. Stress Urinary Incontinence in Younger Women in Primary Care: Prevalence and Opportunistic Intervention. J Womens Health 2014;23(1):65–68; doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4382.
  3. Proulx L, Brizzolara K, Thompson M, et al. Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain Demonstrate Increased Lumbopelvic Muscle Stiffness Compared to Asymptomatic Controls. J Womens Health 2023;32(2):239–247.
Disclosures
Funding This study was conducted with the support of the Research Plan of the University of Córdoba, “Enrique Aguilar Benítez de Lugo”, 2023 – (Spain). Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Córdoba (Spain) (registration number 4074, 20 December 2018 approved). Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
Citation

Continence 12S (2024) 101626
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2024.101626

20/08/2024 18:10:23