Preventive analgesia in postoperative pain management following transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

Fan Y1, Chen Y1, Lyu X1, Luo D1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Abstract 238
Female Pelvic Floor Disorders
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 22
Friday 25th October 2024
10:22 - 10:30
Hall N102
Incontinence Pelvic Organ Prolapse Prevention Stress Urinary Incontinence Pain, Pelvic/Perineal
1. Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China 2. Pelvic Floor Diseases Center, West China Tianfu Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Preventive analgesia aims to minimize sensitization and pain caused by perioperative noxious stimuli. Despite the critical issue of postoperative pain in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries, there are currently no specific guidelines for a standard preventive analgesia scheme in this context. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive analgesia in reducing postoperative pain after transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries.
Study design, materials and methods
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 19, 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized trials assessing the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within 24 hours post-operation and the total postoperative opioids consumption in various types of transvaginal reconstructive surgeries excluding hysterectomy. To evaluate biases, we utilized the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. 
The Bayesian inference based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods are more robust with small sample sizes and could be exploited to address the uncertain detection bias with expert-adjusted prior distributions. Therefore, we applied Bayesian meta-analysis with random effects model to assess the standard mean difference (SMD) of cumulated VAS until post operative day 1 (cVAS POD-1) as the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the amount of total postoperative opioids consumption (POC, measured by milligram).
Results
A total of 10 studies involving 843 participants were included, with 425 in the preventive analgesia group and 418 in the control group. Preventive analgesia primarily entailed the local administration of lidocaine or bupivacaine around the pelvic surgical incision, covering procedures such as mid-urethral sling, sacrospinous ligament colpopexy, and posterior colporrhaphy. The SMD of cVAS POD-1 between the two groups was -0.15 (95% CrI: -0.40 to 0.10), with the exact probability of being lower than zero calculated from the posterior distribution, i.e., P(SMD<0) = 90.15%. The SMD of POC was -0.28 (95% CrI: -0.54 ~ -0.06), with P(SMD<0) = 99.13%.
Interpretation of results
Despite the implementation of preventive analgesia, there was not a clinically significant reduction in postoperative pain levels following transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries, as indicated by the minimal effect size observed in cVAS POD-1. However, it did contribute to a small to moderate reduction in postoperative opioid consumption, suggesting a potential benefit in reducing opioid use in this patient population.
Concluding message
The findings suggest that while preventive analgesia may not substantially alleviate postoperative pain, it could play a role in reducing opioid consumption following transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgeries. Further research is warranted to explore additional strategies or interventions that may effectively address postoperative pain in this patient population.
Figure 1 Fig. The forest plot of Standardized Mean Differences (effect sizes) of included studies based on the Bayesian model.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human
Citation

Continence 12S (2024) 101580
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2024.101580

16/12/2024 20:56:15