Anticholinergic burden in treatment naïve OAB patients: how much is too much?

Oliveira J1, Oliveira S2, Vale L1, Fernades C1, Silva J1, Antunes-Lopes T1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Overactive Bladder

Gold Pass video coming soon
Find out more

Abstract 215
Overactive Bladder: Pharmacotherapy and Patient Phenotyping
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 21
Friday 25th October 2024
09:00 - 09:07
Hall N106
Overactive Bladder Incontinence Pharmacology
1. Centro Hospitalar e Universitário São João, 2. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Overactive bladder is a bothersome condition for which anticholinergic drugs (AC) are one of the cornerstones of treatment. Nevertheless, many patients have comorbidities requiring drugs that, besides their main pharmacologic target, also have anticholinergic properties. Recently, growing concern has surrounded AC’s adverse effects. Anticholinergic burden (ABu) represents the cumulative effect of taking one or more medications with anticholinergic action in an individual and is quantifiable by several validated scales, such as the Drug Burden Index (DBI). 
Therefore, we aimed to describe ABu in treatment naïve OAB patients, analyze prescription trends according to ABu, and study its impact on OAB treatment success.
Study design, materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed all patients referred to our outpatient clinic for OAB from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2022. Exclusion criteria included neurogenic bladder; patients who already started on AC/mirabegron for OAB by the referring physician; history of pelvic radiotherapy; history of bladder cancer; postvoid residual volume > 200 mL; clinically significant stress urinary incontinence; chronic pelvic pain syndrome, congenital urinary tract malformations, history of bladder surgery, history of midurethral sling or prostatic surgery, chronic kidney failure on dialysis. ABu was ascertained using Drug Burden Index (DBI). This study was approved by our institution ethics committee.
Results
During the study time frame, 102 treatment naïve OAB patients were referred to our outpatient clinic. Mean age was 62,36 ± 15,05 years and 82,4% of patients were women. OAB wet was the most frequent phenotype as 74,5% of patients reported urge incontinence, using a mean of 2,78 ± 1,56 pads per day.AC drugs were the initial treatment in 98% of cases. Median (range) DBI was 0,09 (0-3,07). AC drugs were the most frequently prescribed therapy across all DBI groups (0;0-1;>1). On follow up appointment, 61,5% of patients reported improvement of their complaints with the prescribed therapy. In the group of patients with a DBI of 0, 77,1% reported improving after AC therapy, in those with a DBI between 0 and 1, 52 % reported improving and in the group with a DBI>1 only 25,9% reported improving after AC therapy (p<0,001). DBI was significantly higher in the group of patients reporting no improvement after AC therapy when compared with those who reported improvement (p<0,001).
Interpretation of results
Urologists are still not attentive of ABu when treating OAB, as AC drugs were the most prescribed medication irrespective of DBI. Patients with a higher ABu demonstrated worse treatment outcomes, confirming ABu is an important determinant of AC therapy success.
Concluding message
Therefore, physicians should integrate ABu determination in their clinical practice and may need to consider drugs targeting other pathways such as the beta 3 adrenergic receptor in this group of patients.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Centro Hospitalar de São João Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
Citation

Continence 12S (2024) 101557
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2024.101557

19/11/2024 18:08:06