Spanish Multicentre ATOMS Study

González-López R1, Angulo Cuesta J2, Villagrasa García M3, Mosquera Seoane T4, Romero Hoyuela A5, Coloma del Peso A6, Rodríguez Rodríguez A7, Sánchez Merino J8, Escribano Patiño G9, Bermúdez Villaverde R10, Rodríguez Pérez A11, González Enguita C1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Male Stress Urinary Incontinence (Post Prostatectomy Incontinence)

Abstract 145
Male Incontinence: What is in the Pipeline for Postprostatectomy Incontinence
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 14
Thursday 24th October 2024
12:30 - 12:37
Hall N106
Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery
1. H.U. Fundación Jiménez Díaz y H.U. Infanta Elena, 2. H.U. Getafe, 3. H.U. Donostia, 4. C.H.U. Ferrol, 5. H.U. Morales Meseguer, 6. H.U. Henares, 7. H. del Mar, 8. C.H.U. A Coruña, 9. H.G.U. Gregorio Marañón, 10. H.U. Segovia, 11. H.U. Virgen del Rocío
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is the standard treatment for moderate-to severe male stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Recently, adjustable devices have been used for the treatment of mild-to moderate male SUI. These devices add more surgical possibilities for our patients.

The aim of this study is to report our experience with ATOMS® device in the treatment of male SUI with a long follow-up.
Study design, materials and methods
Retrospective, nonrandomised, multicentre study.

Seven-hundred twelve ATOMS® devices have been implanted in thirty-nine tertiary hospitals in Spain, from September 2012 to March 2021.
Data collection of clinical chart and clinical interview and exploration of the patients was performed. Clinical data, etiology and SUI severity were initially collected. Preoperative evaluation was performed by cough stress test, cystoscopy, 24-hours pad-test, and urodynamics (flowmetry or complete study when necessary). Outcomes, complications, and evolution were registered at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months. Global improvement was analyzed with PGI-I questionnaire and scale of satisfaction with device.
Continence rate was stablished: cured (as no leakage), and improvement (as more than 50% of leakage reduction).
Statistical analysis was done through Stata 2.0.
Results
Mean age was 69.3 years (±7.3). Radical prostatectomy was the most common cause of SUI (86.3%). One-hundred fifty-six patients had received external radiotherapy (ERT) previously (22.2%).
Fifty-five percent of patients had mild-to-moderate SUI, and 45% were severe SUI. Four-hundred ninety-five patients had 12 months follow-up, 282 had 2 years, and 184 patients had 3 years.

Continence rate: 89% at 12 months (60.9% cured), 89.2% at 24 months (65.3% cured), and 86.9% at 36 months (66.2% cured).

Lower continence rate was found in ERT patients, severe incontinence, and those with urethrotomy (p<0.0001).

No relation between adjustments, device volume, and SUI severity were found.

Fifty-four abdominal valves (7.7%), fifty scrotal valves (7.1%) and 598 scrotal pre-assembled valves (85.2%) have been implanted. 

There were 1% complications during surgery. 
Minor complications have been registered: there were 17 (2.4%) spontaneous voided devices which were managed by refilling with solution made with sterile water plus contrast dye. Twenty-seven patients developed acute urinary retention and voided device was required, solving retention in all patients. Sixteen patients had hematoma, with conservative management and 89 patients developed transient perineal pain.
These complications were not associated with any risk factor (p>0.05).


Major complications: twenty-one valve infections and 45 valve extrusions. Twenty-nine patients needed valve removal. Forty-three patients needed total device removal due to valve extrusion, device infection, or device disfunction (6%).
Total device removal was associated with previous ERT (p<0.003).

Changes were found between pre and post-treatment flowmetry, with 2 points Q max reduction (-2.14 (-3.42, -0.87), p 0.001).

According to the PGI questionnaire, 77.4% of patients felt much better.
The degree of patient satisfaction was high (84% moderate to high).
Interpretation of results
ATOMS® device is a safe and effective treatment for male SUI and its effect remains during follow-up. In fact, this device has proved to be an alternative to AUS, including in those patients with severe incontinence.
There is no need to manipulate the device and it allows treating more patients than with AUS. 
The position above the muscle can avoid urethral complications, especially in those patients who have received external radiotherapy. Our complications rate and risk factors associated to persistent incontinence are very similar to previous published in literature (1).
Concluding message
Male SUI can be successfully treated with ATOMS® device. This device is safe, easy to implant and has a low rate of complications and device explantations. Previous ERT might influence the achievement of complete continence after implantation. Counselling with radiated patient before implantation is necessary to warn about lower rates of total continence.
References
  1. Angulo, J.C.; Téllez, C.; Giammò, A.; González-Enguita, C.; Schoenburg, S.; Queissert, F.; Szczesniewski, J.; González, R.; Romero, A.; Gonsior, A.; et al. Results of Adjustable Trans-Obturator Male System in Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Prostatectomy and Radiotherapy: A Multicenter Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4721. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144721
Disclosures
Funding Nothig Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee CEIM Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
Citation

Continence 12S (2024) 101487
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2024.101487

19/11/2024 18:02:51