Urodynamic characteristics of post-micturition dribble in men

Matsukawa Y1, Mori A1, Watanabe R1, Nagyama J1, Naito Y1, Funahashi Y1, Akamatsu S1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urodynamics

Gold Pass video coming soon
Find out more

Abstract 114
Urodynamics
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 11
Thursday 24th October 2024
10:22 - 10:30
N102
Incontinence Voiding Dysfunction Male
1. Department of Urology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
Presenter
Y

Yoshihisa Matsukawa

Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Although post-micturition dribble (PMD) is a common and bothersome symptom, the frequency and factors involved are not well understood. We investigated the frequency and pathogenesis of PMD from a urodynamic perspective in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in clinical practice.
Study design, materials and methods
This study included treatment-naïve men aged ≥40 years, who visited our hospital with a chief complaint of LUTS (international prostate symptom score [IPSS] total score of ≥8) and underwent urodynamic studies (UDS), including cytometry and pressure-flow study. PMD was assessed by adding the following question to the IPSS: “Over the last month, how often did you experience dribbling after voiding and got your underwear wet?”. Patients who answered "not at all" to this question were defined as those without PMD (the PMD-free group), and those who answered "more than half the time" or " almost always" were defined as those with PMD (the PMD group). 
This study focused on the detrusor pressure after voiding and calculated the time to return to the pre-voiding pressure (defined as “recovery time to baseline detrusor pressure”), as shown in the Figure. Patient characteristics and UDS parameters, including recovery time to baseline detrusor pressure, were compared between the two groups.
Results
Of the 739 patients analyzed, 81 (11.0%) were classified into the PMD group and 167 (22.6%) into the PMD-free group. Although there were no significant differences in age or prostate volume between the two groups, the PMD group had significantly higher subjective symptoms such as IPSS, overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), and IPSS-quality of life score. UDS parameters of voiding function, including maximum flow rate and bladder outlet obstruction index, showed no difference, whereas the bladder capacity was significantly smaller and the frequency of detrusor overactivity was significantly higher in the PMD group. Notably, the mean recovery time to baseline detrusor pressure in the PMD group was 47.9 seconds, which was significantly longer than that in the PMD-free group (14.7 seconds, p <0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that a longer recovery time to baseline detrusor pressure was significantly associated with the occurrence of PMD (Table).
Interpretation of results
Although it has been thought that PMD is caused by trapped urine in the bulbar urethra due to the weakening of pelvic floor muscle such as bulbocavernosus muscle, delayed return of detrusor contraction to baseline also may have caused PMD. The exact mechanism by which this causes PMD is unknown, but it is possible that prolonged detrusor contractions after voiding leads to inadequate closure of the urethral sphincter, resulting in influx of urine into the bulbar urethra.
Concluding message
More than 75% of men with LUTS experience PMD, and approximately 10% have PMD almost all the time. Although the cause of PMD is expected to be multifactorial, delayed recovery to baseline detrusor pressure after voiding may be associated with its occurrence.
Figure 1 Definition of “recovery time to baseline detrusor pressure” in the pressure-flow study
Figure 2
Disclosures
Funding None. Clinical Trial Yes Public Registry No RCT No Subjects Human Ethics Committee The Institutional Review Board of the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
Citation

Continence 12S (2024) 101456
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2024.101456

20/08/2024 18:07:39