Effect of bladder outlet procedures on urodynamic assessments in men with an acontractile or underactive detrusor: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Merode van N1, Nijholt I1, Heesakkers J2, Koeveringe G2, Steffens M1, Witte L1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Urodynamics

Best in Category Prize: Urodynamics
Abstract 11
Best Urology
Scientific Podium Session 3
Wednesday 27th September 2023
12:15 - 12:30
Theatre 102
Underactive Bladder Male Bladder Outlet Obstruction Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Urodynamics Techniques
1. Isala Clinics, 2. Maastricht UMC+
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
The benefits of bladder outlet procedures in men with detrusor underactivity (DU) or acontractile detrusor (AD) remain debatable. These can produce uncertain results in men with DU, but without bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), potentially causing needless exposure to perioperative risk and long-term adverse effects(1). By contrast, bladder outlet procedures are the cornerstone of management for BOO. Two recent systematic reviews of the preoperative effect of DU on transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy have failed to offer clarity (2,3). One concluded that preoperative DU can exclude patients unsuitable for bladder outlet procedures, finding that men with DU had less improvement on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) compared to men without DU(2). However, they found no differences for either quality of life (QoL) or postvoid residual (PVR). The other concluded that surgical bladder outlet procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with DU improved QoL, IPSS, and PVR(3). Urodynamics (UDS) to assess bladder contractility after bladder outlet procedures could explain both these putative clinical benefits and the underlying mechanisms. We hypothesized that surgical treatment of the bladder outlet (i.e., the prostate) can restore balance between bladder contractility and outlet resistance in favor of the bladder, thereby improving urodynamic parameters and symptoms. This systematic review describes the literature on urodynamic outcomes, symptom scores, and QoL before and after bladder outlet procedures in males with DU or AD.
Study design, materials and methods
We adhered to the standard PRISMA guidelines and registered the review with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42020215832). Our search query was developed under the guidance of an information specialist and the research team, with searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline conducted on October 23, 2020, and updated on December 27, 2021. We included studies of men aged 18 years or older with non-neurogenic DU or AD if they had undergone a bladder outlet procedure, but we excluded studies of prostate cancer or neurogenic bladder (i.e., spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, or central nervous system disease). DU was defined as a bladder contractility index (BCI; PdetQmax+ 5Qmax) < 100 or a PdetQmax <40 cmH20. The primary outcomes were detrusor pressure at maximum flow (PdetQmax) and maximum flow rate (Qmax). Secondary outcomes were the IPSS and QoL. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias using the National Institute of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH/NHLBI) quality assessment tool for pre-post studies with no control group. Two reviewers assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for each outcome.
Results
Of the 3677 publications found, 13 pre-post studies were eventually included. Six studies showed a decrease and seven studies showed an increase in PdetQmax postoperatively (pooled mean change of 5.99; 95%CI [0.59–11.40]; P = 0.03; I2, 95%). All subgroups with a preoperative BCI of <50 showed a PdetQmax increase after surgery (pooled mean difference, 20.05; 95%CI, 11.75–28.35; Z = 4.73; P < 0.00001). All studies with a preoperative BCI ≥50 showed a PdetQmax decrease after treatment (-6.99; 95%CI -13.13 - -0.86; Z = 2.23, P = 0.03), except for one using the subgroup “mild DUA”. Substantial heterogeneity existed in both analyses. An improvement in Qmax was seen postoperatively in all studies (pooled mean change of 5.87, 95%CI [4.25–7.49]; I2 93%). Quality of life was reported in three studies with a pooled significant improvement postoperatively (-2.41 points; 95%CI [-2.81 to -2.01]; P = 0.007). IPSS was described in seven studies with all studies showing an improvement (-12.82; 95%CI [-14.76--10.88]; P < 0.001). Twelve studies had a moderate risk of bias, and one had a high risk of bias (Table 3). The certainty of evidence was low for the outcomes Qmax, IPSS, and QoL, and it was very low for PdetQmax (Table 4).
Interpretation of results
All studies reported improvements in the maximum flow rate (Qmax), IPSS, and QoL, independent of the degree of bladder contractility. Furthermore, detrusor pressure at maximum flow (PdetQmax) increased after surgery for those with a BCI <50 and, but it decreased for patients with a BCI ≥50. It is widely accepted that detrusor contractile strength is determined by bladder outlet resistance. In patients treated for BOO, the PdetQmax typically decreases and the Qmax increases, whereas we found that the PdetQmax and Qmax both increased after bladder outlet procedures in patients with severe underactive bladders or AD (i.e., BCI <50 and/or PVR ≥200 mL), which is surprising.
Concluding message
This review shows that detrusor pressure at maximum voiding (PdetQmax) increases after surgical bladder outlet procedures in men with underactive bladders or AD (i.e., baseline BCI <50). Therefore, we derive that surgical bladder outlet procedures should not be excluded for men with DU or AD based on current evidence, and instead, should be discussed as part of the shared decision-making process. The low to very low certainty of the evidence in this systematic review and meta-analysis points to the need for further studies in this field.
Figure 1 Forest plots of PdetQmax values pre- and post bladder outlet procedure stratified by bladder contractility index
References
  1. Drake MJ. Is Urodynamics Necessary when Assessing a Patient with Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms? Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(1):54-56. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.008
  2. Kim M, Jeong CW, Oh SJ. Effect of Preoperative Urodynamic Detrusor Underactivity on Transurethral Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol. 2018;199(1):237-244. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.079
  3. Creta M, Ruvolo CC, Longo N, et al. Detrusor overactivity and underactivity: implication for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostate hyperplasia diagnosis and treatment. Minerva urology and nephrology. 2021;73(1):59-71. doi:10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03678-4
Disclosures
Funding Isala Innovation and Science Fund Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd It was a systematic review and meta-analysis Helsinki not Req'd Not applicable Informed Consent No
Citation

Continence 7S1 (2023) 100729
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2023.100729

20/11/2024 16:21:26