The preoperative dyslipidemia and high overactive bladder symptom score predict de novo overactive bladder after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Imai H1, Akaihata H1, Kumekawa T1, Natsuya H1, Hasegawa A1, Harigane Y1, Matsuoka Y1, Onagi A1, Matsuoka K1, Hoshi S1, Koguchi T1, Hata J1, Sato Y1, Kataoka M1, Kojima Y1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Prostate Clinical / Surgical

Abstract 518
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 34
Saturday 10th September 2022
13:05 - 13:10 (ePoster Station 1)
Exhibition Hall
Questionnaire Overactive Bladder Surgery
1. Fukushima Medical University
Online
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Overactive Bladder (OAB) is a nonspecific storage symptom complex with poorly defined pathophysiology. OAB have a negative impact on quality of life. Some patients have de novo OAB after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Although the operative procedure is one cause of de novo OAB after RARP, it is possible that the preoperative characteristics of the patient contribute to onset of de novo OAB after RARP. This study aims to determine whether the preoperative characteristics of the patients affect the de novo OAB after RARP.
Study design, materials and methods
Patients without OAB who underwent RARP for localized prostate cancer at our hospital between February 2013 and October 2020 were included in this study. At 12 months after RARP, these patients were divided into the OAB-free group and de novo OAB group according to absence or presence of OAB. The preoperative age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), dyslipidemia (LDL-C/HDL-C ratio ≥ 2.5), HbA1c, uroflowmetry parameter, post-void residual urine volume (PVR), bladder voiding efficiency (BVE); (voided volume/total bladder capacity) × 100, prostate volume (PV) and overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) were compared between the OAB-free group and de novo OAB group. All values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Mann–Whitney U test was used for analysis of categorical variables, and linear regression analysis was used for continuous variables. P-values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results
A total of 404 patients (67.0 ± 5.3 years) entered the study (OAB-free group: 338 patients, de novo OAB group: 66 patients). The percentage of patients with dyslipidemia was significantly higher in the de novo OAB group than in the OAB-free group (OAB-free group vs de novo OAB group: 32.0 % vs 45.5 %, P=0.04). The total OABSS was significantly higher in the de novo OAB group then in the OAB-free group (OAB-free group vs de novo OAB group: 2.1 ± 1.4 points vs 3.2 ± 1.6 points, P<0.01). The preoperative age, blood pressure, obesity, HbA1c, uroflowmetry parameter, PVR, BVE and PV were not significant differences between two groups.
Interpretation of results
We demonstrated that preoperative dyslipidemia, which was defined as LDL-C/HDL-C ratio ≥ 2.5 in this study, and high OABSS contributed to onset of de novo OAB after RARP. Recent studies have demonstrated that dyslipidemia contributes to the lower urinary tract dysfunction. Several studies have also reported that LDL-C/HDL-C ratio more accurately predicts cardiovascular disease risk than LDL-C or HDL-C levels and that elevated LDL-C/HDL-C ratio is associated with progression of atherosclerosis1). The atherosclerosis is well known to cause OAB by chronic bladder ischemia. The preoperative elevated LDL-C/HDL-C ratio may cause de novo OAB after RARP through chronic bladder ischemia. The patients with preoperative high OABSS might have bladder instability although they were not diagnosed as OAB. After RARP, the bladder instability might become worse, resulting in de novo OAB.
Concluding message
Our results suggested that the preoperative dyslipidemia and high OABSS were one cause of de novo OAB after RARP. the preoperative dyslipidemia and high OABSS may be useful marker of De novo OAB after RARP.
References
  1. Noike H, et al: Relationships between intravascular ultrasonographic findings and coronary risk factors in patients with normal coronary angiography. J Cardiol. 2005;45:1-10.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Fukushima Medical University Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
17/04/2025 14:31:58