Analysis of a specialist colorectal pelvic floor service within a district general hospital

Blake I1, Nockolds C1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Health Services Delivery

Abstract 481
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 30
Saturday 10th September 2022
11:25 - 11:30 (ePoster Station 6)
Exhibition Hall
Anal Incontinence Constipation Pelvic Floor Conservative Treatment Surgery
1. Mid Cheshire NHS FoundationTrust
Online
Presenter
Links

Poster

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Pelvic floor dysfunction has a high prevalence and has a significant impact on quality of life. Despite this there is currently no overarching approach to the provision of pelvic floor services in the United Kingdom. The investigation and treatment of patients presenting with pelvic floor symptoms are delivered via a mixture of non-specialists and specialist local or regional services. We aimed to analyse the case mix and management of patients presenting to a local district hospital colorectal pelvic floor service that comprises 2 colorectal surgeons with a sub specialty interest, a specialist nurse and physiotherapist.
Study design, materials and methods
All patients who attended the colorectal pelvic floor clinic in a district general hospital between October 2011 and July 2019 were retrospectively identified from clinic records. Their case files were reviewed in order to determine patient demographics, investigations performed, diagnosis and subsequent management.
Results
In total 342 records were analysed. The majority of patients were female (94.7%) with a mean age of 56.2 years. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy was the commonest investigation (96.5%), followed by proctography (40.6%) and manometry (27.5%). Symptoms and signs included obstructive defecation (28.4%), passive faecal incontinence (28.4%), urge faecal incontinence (18.9%), constipation (9.5%), rectal prolapse (6.8%), rectocele (5.8%) and mucosal prolapse (1.1%).  

A small number (4.5%) of patients were referred to a tertiary MDT but the vast majority were managed locally. A significant number of patients (32.6%) underwent nurse led management. Interventions included physiotherapy (36.6%), irrigation (27.9%), laxatives (12.9%), percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (1.6%) and sacral nerve stimulation (0.5%). Surgery occurred in 12.2% of patients, with laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy being the most frequently (5.8%) performed surgical procedure. Other procedures included transanal haemorrhoidal artery devascularisation (3.7%), ileostomy (0.8%), rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids (0.8%), Delorme’s (0.5%) and Altmeirs (0.3%).
Interpretation of results
Patients presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction are overwhelmingly female and of increasing age which is in keeping with known risk factors. The signs and symptoms as well as the required investigations are varied.  Patients attending a colorectal pelvic floor service undergo a wide variety of interventions with the majority being able to be managed through physiotherapy or medically, and a significant number are able to be managed exclusively by specialist nurses. Only a minority of the patients ultimately require surgical intervention.
Concluding message
With the right skill mix, ready access to investigations and supportive tertiary services the majority of patients presenting to a colorectal pelvic floor clinic can be managed successfully in a district general hospital setting.
Disclosures
Funding No funding Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd retrospective audit of casenotes Helsinki Yes Informed Consent No
04/10/2024 18:32:57