Hypothesis / aims of study
Polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG, Bulkamid®) is one of several injectable agents currently used for the treatment of women with urinary stress incontinence (SUI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the preoperative clinical characteristics of women with SUI and mixed urinary incontinence with predominant stress form, underwent to transurethral injection of Bulkamid and persistent incontinence after the procedure.
Study design, materials and methods
This was a single-center prospective study. The local ethics committee approved the study and all patients signed an informed consent document. We included women who underwent transurethral injection of Bulkamid , on bladder neck, for SUI and mixed urinary incontinence with predominant stress form. We excluded women with pelvic organ prolapse or with a history of anti incontinence surgery. The preoperative evaluation included a medical history, a clinical examination, urodynamic study and a dynamic translabial ultrasound. SUI was defined according to ICS standards and classified according to the Ingelman-Sundberg scale. Follow-up visit included a medical history, physical examination, and uroflowmetry with PVR measurement. A dynamic translabial ultrasound was performed 6 months post-surgery and again at the last visit. The objective cure for SUI was defined as the absence of urine leakage during the stress test. To determine the statistical significance of categorical data comparisons, we performed the Chi-squared test with a continuity correction for each 2 × 2 contingency table.Fisher’s exact test was used when expected frequencies were insufficient for a Chisquared test. We considered p < 0.05 to be statistically significant.
Interpretation of results
The failure of the bulking agent is a multifactorial phenomenon. The closure of the open bladder neck with the bulking agent could be one of the factors that guarantees post-operative continence.The reason why women with open baldder neck are more prone to treatment failure is not clear. Our technique involves making 4 wheals at the level of the bladder neck. An open neck is probably related to a more severe degree of incontinence.Infact, most of the patients, in this study,have stress incontinence grade III
However Kirchin showed that there are no-significant advantage in terms of patient satisfaction after mid-urethral injection in comparison to bladder neck injection but with no demonstrable difference in continence levels.
Also a short urethra could compromise the success of the procedure by creating technical problems. It may be difficult to perform wheals in a short urethra.Mixed incontinence may not benefit from bulking agent treatment due to the different pathophysiological mechanism.