Hypothesis / aims of study
Open and Laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy are established treatment options for symptomatic and complicated bladder diverticulum, with few reports of RABD. Bladder diverticula can be congenital or acquired. Acquired diverticula are often multiple, occur later in life and typically result from bladder outflow obstruction; commonly Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (1). Surgery is indicated for significant lower urinary tract symptoms, recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or complications such as bladder calculi or malignancy (2). We reviewed the surgical and functional outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) of patients treated at a tertiary centre.
Study design, materials and methods
All patients who underwent RABD between 2015 and 2019 had data collected prospectively. Data includes patient demographics, operative parameters, functional outcomes and QoL. Surgical outcomes include mean operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, complications and diverticula measurements. Functional outcomes include whether the patient was catheter-dependent, experiencing recurrent UTI and post void residual volumes. QoL was measured using the validated IPSS questionnaire and bother scores, along with simple Likert scale denoting level of benefit with treatment (from -3 to 3).
Interpretation of results
In our cohort there was an improvement in functional outcomes as demonstrated by reduced percentage of patients experiencing recurrent UTIs, previously SPC-dependent patient now catheter-free and a reduction in post-void residuals. The IPSS, bother score and Likert scale show an improvement in QoL.
Previous comparison between open vs laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy show an overall increase in operative time with laparoscopy but reduced estimated blood loss, reduced analgesia requirement and reduced length of hospital stay (3). RABD allows greater dexterity and precision than standard laparoscopy, and our surgical outcomes echo this as a safe approach.