A total of 60 female Wistar rats were used and randomly assigned to one of the following four treatment groups of 15 animals each: 1. Control (CON) 2. Retinyl acetate (RA) 3. Blebbistatin (BLEB) 4. Retinyl acetate plus blebbistatin (RA + BLEB). The following drugs were used: Retinyl acetate with a mixture of Polysorbate 80 and saline; (±)-Blebbistatin: a small cell permeable selective inhibitor of the myosin-ADP-Pi complex blocking the myosin II in an actin-detached state, was dissolved in DMSO. Animals were catheterised and drug instillation was performed followed by the cystometry and urothelium thickness measurement. Cystometric evaluation was performed 3 days after surgical procedures in conscious unrestrained animals. The bladder catheter was attached and connected to a microinjection pump (CMA 100, CMA Microdialysis AB, Kista, Sweden) and to a pressure transducer (FT03, Grass Technologies, West Warwick, RI, U.S.A.) using a three-way stopcock. The rat bladder was first infused with 125 nmol of the BLEB or vehicle for 30 min. Conscious cystometry was then performed by slowly filling the bladder with physiological saline at a constant rate 0.05 mL/min to provoke repetitive voiding. The following cystometric parameters were recorded: volume threshold (VT, ml), micturition voiding pressure (MVP, cm H2O), basal pressure (BP, cm H2O), nonvoiding contractions amplitude (ANVC, cm H2O), detrusor overactivity index (DOI, cm H2O/ml), bladder compliance (BC, ml/cm H2O), threshold pressure (TP, cm H2O), voided volume (VV, ml), post-void residual (PVR, ml), , voiding efficiency (VE, %), intercontraction interval (ICI, s), bladder contraction duration (BCD, s), volume threshold to elicit NVC (VTNVC, %), nonvoiding contractions frequency (FNVC, times/filling phase), and relaxation time (RT, s). After the cystometric assessment, bladder edema and urothelium thickness were measured.
The obtained data were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (Statistica, v. 10, StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, U.S.A.). All results are presented as the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Herein, p < 0.05 was considered as a statistically significant difference.